1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 8,357 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Viper weights approximately 635 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (979 Nm) has 909 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 2000 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Allegro | Viper |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 8357 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 979 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |