1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2003 Noble M14
To start off, 2003 Noble M14 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Noble M14 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Noble M14 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 2003 Noble M14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Noble M14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Austin Allegro | 2003 Noble M14 | |
| Make | Austin | Noble |
| Model | Allegro | M14 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 396 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |
