1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1981 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Allegro | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 4161 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3280 mm |