1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 967 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Austin Allegro | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | Allegro | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2427 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1817 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |
