1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2005 Ford F-350
To start off, 2005 Ford F-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1981 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-350 weights approximately 1785 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-350 (495 Nm) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 2005 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Allegro | F-350 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 2585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3490 mm |