1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2009 Ford Taurus

To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Taurus (263 HP @ 6251 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1981 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Taurus weights approximately 310 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Taurus (338 Nm @ 4501 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Allegro. 2009 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1981 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1981 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Austin Allegro 2009 Ford Taurus
Make Austin Ford
Model Allegro Taurus
Year Released 1981 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 44 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6251 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4501 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 800 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2870 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]