1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2010 Kia Carnival is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Carnival weights approximately 1370 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Carnival has automatic transmission and 1981 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1981 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Carnival will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Austin Allegro | 2010 Kia Carnival | |
| Make | Austin | Kia |
| Model | Allegro | Carnival |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2902 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2910 mm |
