1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1981 Austin Allegro. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Allegro | Pixo |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2360 mm |