1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1981 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Allegro | Megane |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2690 mm |