1981 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 989 kg more than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Allegro | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2423 mm |