1981 Austin Marina vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1981 Austin Marina is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1981 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1981 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Marina | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Marina | 62 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 2085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |