1981 Austin Marina vs. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Marina would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1981 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 710 kg more than 1981 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Austin Marina | 2000 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | Marina | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4960 mm |
