1981 Austin Maxi vs. 1982 Dodge 600
To start off, 1982 Dodge 600 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1981 Austin Maxi. (91 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1981 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Maxi. (141 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Maxi | 1982 Dodge 600 | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Maxi | 600 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2630 mm |