1981 Austin Maxi vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1981 Austin Maxi. (91 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Austin Maxi (141 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1981 Austin Maxi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 1981 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1981 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Maxi | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | Cube |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 141 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 82 L |