1981 Austin Maxi vs. 2010 Kia Amanti
To start off, 2010 Kia Amanti is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Amanti is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Amanti (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1981 Austin Maxi. (91 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Amanti should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Amanti (261 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Maxi. (141 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Amanti will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Maxi. 2010 Kia Amanti has automatic transmission and 1981 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1981 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Amanti will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Maxi | 2010 Kia Amanti | |
Make | Austin | Kia |
Model | Maxi | Amanti |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 261 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |