1981 Austin Princess vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1981 Austin Princess is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Austin Princess weights approximately 464 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Austin Princess | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Austin | Lotus |
| Model | Princess | Elan |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1557 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 696 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2140 mm |
