1981 Austin Princess vs. 1968 Dodge Dart
To start off, 1981 Austin Princess is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Dodge Dart is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Dodge Dart weights approximately 217 kg more than 1981 Austin Princess.
Because 1968 Dodge Dart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Dodge Dart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Princess | 1968 Dodge Dart | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Princess | Dart |
Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 5210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1377 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2830 mm |