1981 Austin Princess vs. 1969 Ford 17
To start off, 1981 Austin Princess is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Austin Princess weights approximately 85 kg more than 1969 Ford 17.
Because 1969 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Princess | 1969 Ford 17 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | 17 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2710 mm |