1981 Austin Princess vs. 1985 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1985 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Mustang weights approximately 20 kg more than 1981 Austin Princess.
Because 1985 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Princess | 1985 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Mustang |
Year Released | 1981 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2500 mm |