1981 Austin Princess vs. 1994 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 510 kg more than 1981 Austin Princess.
Because 1994 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Princess | 1994 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Mustang |
Year Released | 1981 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2580 mm |