1981 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Austin Princess weights approximately 35 kg more than 2010 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2010 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Princess | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Princess | Tribute |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2630 mm |