1981 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1956 Buick 40
To start off, 1981 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 930 kg more than 1981 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1956 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Autobianchi A 112 | 1956 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Buick |
| Model | A 112 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 5279 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3110 mm |
