1981 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1989 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1989 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Mustang weights approximately 590 kg more than 1981 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1989 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Autobianchi A 112 | 1989 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1981 | 1989 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2560 mm |