1981 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 914 kg more than 1981 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1981 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1981 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Autobianchi A 112 | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mercury |
| Model | A 112 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1574 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |
