1981 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2004 BMW M5
To start off, 2004 BMW M5 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M5 weights approximately 1098 kg more than 1981 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2004 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Autobianchi A 112 | 2004 BMW M5 | |
Make | Autobianchi | BMW |
Model | A 112 | M5 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 500 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1758 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |