1981 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1981 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Jeep |
| Model | A 112 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4138 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |
