1981 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 555 kg more than 1981 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1981 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1981 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Autobianchi | Renault |
Model | A 112 | Clio |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 186 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 55 L |