1981 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 1042 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Because 1981 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Bentley Mulsanne | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | Bentley | Ford |
| Model | Mulsanne | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2730 mm |
