1981 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 135 kg more than 1981 Bentley Mulsanne.
Because 1981 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Bentley Mulsanne | 2009 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
Model | Mulsanne | Malibu |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 2385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2860 mm |