1981 Bitter SC vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1981 Bitter SC is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Bitter SC (180 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Bitter SC weights approximately 684 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Bitter SC | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Bitter | DAF |
| Model | SC | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2969 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 33 L |
