1981 Bitter SC vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Bitter SC would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Bitter SC (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Bitter SC. (248 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Bitter SC | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bitter | Chevrolet |
Model | SC | Camaro |
Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2969 cc | 4995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 248 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.1 mm | 94.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.8 mm | 88.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2570 mm |