1981 BMW 518 vs. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 BMW 518. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 BMW 518 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1981 BMW 518. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1981 BMW 518. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 450 kg more than 1981 BMW 518. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 BMW 518 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 BMW 518. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 BMW 518 | 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | BMW | Daewoo |
| Model | 518 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1766 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4960 mm |
