1981 BMW 518 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 BMW 518. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 BMW 518 would be higher. At 1,766 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 BMW 518 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 BMW 518 (90 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 BMW 518 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 BMW 518 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 BMW 518 (140 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1981 BMW 518 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1981 BMW 518 | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 518 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1766 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1810 mm |