1981 BMW 525 vs. 2006 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 BMW 525 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1981 BMW 525. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1981 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Durango weights approximately 999 kg more than 1981 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Durango (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 BMW 525. (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
1981 BMW 525 | 2006 Dodge Durango | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 525 | Durango |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2279 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 102 L |