1981 BMW 725 vs. 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron
To start off, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 BMW 725 would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron (552 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 404 more horse power than 1981 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron should accelerate faster than 1981 BMW 725.
Because 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 BMW 725. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron (881 Nm) has 666 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 BMW 725. (215 Nm). This means 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 BMW 725.
Compare all specifications:
1981 BMW 725 | 1999 Bugatti EB 18-3 Chiron | |
Make | BMW | Bugatti |
Model | 725 | EB 18-3 Chiron |
Year Released | 1981 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2493 cc | 6255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 18 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 552 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 881 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2650 mm |