1981 BMW 725 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 BMW 725 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1981 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1981 BMW 725.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 BMW 725. (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 BMW 725.

Compare all specifications:

1981 BMW 725 2004 Cadillac CTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 725 CTS
Year Released 1981 2004
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2493 cc 2597 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 215 Nm 232 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 83.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 71.6 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2950 mm