1981 BMW 725 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 BMW 725 would be higher. At 2,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 BMW 725 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 BMW 725 (148 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 BMW 725 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 BMW 725 (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1981 BMW 725 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1981 BMW 725 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 725 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2493 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 215 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 1810 mm |