1981 Bristol 412 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1981 Bristol 412 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1981 Bristol 412.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Bristol 412 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 412 | 62 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3300 mm |