1981 Bristol 412 vs. 1980 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1981 Bristol 412 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Bristol 412 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1980 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1981 Bristol 412 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Bristol 412. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Bristol 412 | 1980 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Bristol | Plymouth |
| Model | 412 | Reliant |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2260 mm |
