1981 Bristol 412 vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Bristol 412 has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Bristol 412 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Bristol 412 | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 412 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1981 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |