1981 Bristol 412 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Bristol 412 weights approximately 482 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Bristol 412 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 412 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3200 mm |