1981 Bristol 412 vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 177 kg more than 1981 Bristol 412.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Bristol 412 | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Bristol | Jeep |
| Model | 412 | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1867 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2660 mm |
