1981 Bristol 412 vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Bristol 412 has automatic transmission and 2009 Subaru Outback has manual transmission. 2009 Subaru Outback will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Bristol 412 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Bristol 412 | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Bristol | Subaru |
Model | 412 | Outback |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 243 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2680 mm |