1981 Bristol 412 vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Acura TL weights approximately 110 kg more than 1981 Bristol 412.
Because 2012 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Bristol 412 | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Bristol | Acura |
Model | 412 | TL |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2776 mm |