1981 Buick LeSabre vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1981 Buick LeSabre. (104 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1981 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 144 kg more than 1981 Buick LeSabre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Buick LeSabre. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Buick LeSabre.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Buick LeSabre 2009 Jaguar XJ
Make Buick Jaguar
Model LeSabre XJ
Year Released 1981 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3790 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 104 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 3400 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 560 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1590 kg 1734 kg
Vehicle Length 5550 mm 5220 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3170 mm