1981 Buick LeSabre vs. 2010 Volvo C30

To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 5,736 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1981 Buick LeSabre. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1981 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 349 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.

Because 1981 Buick LeSabre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Buick LeSabre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Buick LeSabre (274 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo C30. (270 Nm). This means 1981 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo C30. 1981 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: