1981 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2008 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Croma weights approximately 195 kg more than 1981 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1981 Buick Skyhawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Buick Skyhawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 2008 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2008 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Buick Skyhawk | 2008 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Buick | Fiat |
| Model | Skyhawk | Croma |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2710 mm |
