1981 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 360 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Buick Skyhawk | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Buick | Suzuki |
Model | Skyhawk | Equator |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3200 mm |