1981 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2012 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 395 kg more than 2012 Fiat Croma.
Because 1981 Buick Skyhawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Buick Skyhawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Buick Skyhawk | 2012 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Buick | Fiat |
Model | Skyhawk | Croma |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2710 mm |