1981 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Buick Skyhawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Buick Skyhawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Buick Skyhawk | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skyhawk | Epica |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |